EUROPE AND NORTH AFRICA.
What is happening in North Africa, although we can not yet define what new equilibrium will form, however, is intended to invest the whole of Europe and not just the Mediterranean. It is understood by the alarmed tone, even when they are denied, by the concern and even some attempts to reason, even by Italian politicians usually sragionanti as the Northern League's Roberto Maroni.
The answer, however, is same as always: no EU policy, no claim of collective problems (Italy has its own right that can not face alone, with its four thousand kilometers of coastline, the wave of any mass migrations and has also of reasons, when he tries to organize solidarity to refugees in Tunisia).
Regarding Europe, it still does not exist, it's just a common financial market.
The context has changed, however, and if you could somehow vivacchiare nothing to choose according to a long-standing practice for many years, the combined effect of the economic crisis and unrest in North Africa and in particular the Libyan civil war, do not allow that we continue doing the ostrich.
In Libya, it is not being a popular uprising as happened in Egypt and Tunisia (despite all the precautions it takes in those cases), but an armed clash between organized forces, some of them (the rebels) are probably also been pushed to move from external advisers to Libya in the wake of the riots earlier assurances and promises of aid likely.
to advance to the first cases of armed intervention in Libya was the leader less Europe, the British Cameroon, according to the logic of the American fifth column, the historical role of England, well understood at the time by only De Gaulle. According to the British Prime Europeans should sostenere il peso di una guerra che, nel contesto attuale, riporterebbe Stati Uniti e Inghilterra ad avere il controllo sul petrolio libico, dal quale erano sostanzialmente esclusi da quando Gheddafi andò al potere, mentre non sarebbero di certo questi stati a dover fronteggiare l’eventuale migrazione di massa. L’ipotesi d’intervento europeo, infatti, non è altro che un artificio linguistico. Non esistendo alcun esercito e nessuno strumento di difesa comune europea è evidente che sarebbero la Nato e l’Alleanza atlantica ad intervenire: non gli europei, che ne pagherebbero solo i costi sociali.
Arrogante secondo la propria tradizione culturale e politica ma senza lo stile britannico di un tempo, Camerun non si è nemmeno premurato di dire che forse un eventuale intervento deve essere deciso dall’Onu, ponendosi in questo sulla scia del texano Bush. E infatti dalle parole è direttamente passato ai fatti, dal momento che proprio ieri un diplomatico inglese e un elicottero di coglioni olandesi pieni di armi, sono stati presi con le mani nel sacco, cioè arrestati dai ribelli della Cirenaica che erano andati a consigliare. La cosa, naturalmente, ha anche dei risvolti comici come in tutte le tragedie degne di questo nome. Questo però significa una cosa sola: che la Libia è già invasa senza alcun mandato internazionale, da parte di consiglieri militari e quant’altro, inviati dalle potenze occidentali.
Nel frattempo, sono accaduti alcuni fatti significativi in questi giorni che chiariscono alcuni scenari interni e non:
1) il Tg 3 è stato costretto ad ammettere che i 10.000 morti gettati in fosse comuni sono un falso e che le riprese che avrebbero dovuto dimostralo inquadravano un cimitero.
2) Lo stato maggiore russo ha dichiarato ufficialmente che dai loro satelliti non si ha alcuna immagine di bombardamenti sulle manifestazioni ma solo di scontri militari fra miliziani armati da entrambe le parte; certamente con un vantaggio militare da parte dei governativi, ma stiamo parlando di una guerra civile (le fonti sono diverse e facilmente controllabili in internet da chi lo vuole fare e non si accontenta del minculpop occidentale).
3) La top gun Emma Bonino e Walter Veltroni, l’uomo (Along with D'Alema appears) of the war with Serbia and support for the KLA Albanian criminal gangs have made it clear to Libya that the war would have a consensus bipatizan.
4) The silence of fish in a barrel of all others is the sign of the definitive disappearance of every institution possible for a bank that really wants to ask the opposition movement in Italy.
You can not understand now, if the hypothesis of a NATO intervention will or not, because sometimes the devil is not the lids and the unexpected resistance of the system is putting in serious difficulties, the brotherhood of the bombing.
In the U.S. there are a lot of hesitation, especially among the military, but also in Congress: the failures of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are there for all to see.
Whether this hypothesis steps, and that does not pass, however, the North African crisis is bound to make even more precarious relations between the different states of the union, but it could inflict a mortal blow at the same unitary process: this crisis, in fact , is even more serious than the Balkan crisis of 91-92, also because it happens in the middle of a war scenario and permanent latent because it adds to the economic and social development.
All this, however, also opens new possibilities. Europe as it does not exist but can no longer hope to vivacchiare: a similar context can be opened over the first substantial contradictions between governments and within individual states. Policy initiative on some points clear and understandable that aggregates a resistance front that focuses on the interests of the peoples of Europe and not the complex financial and Atlantic and try to accentuate the contradictions that are designed to be open between the states is now more possible.
1) Today's Europe is a political entity is not Federal nor a federation of states, but only a committee of government without a common policy on crucial issues. His government has made real by supranational organizations outside of control People and coordinated by the European Central Bank.
2) The euro is a currency without a state with no sovereignty behind and therefore an aberration unprecedented in history. Sovereignty and currency can not be separated except by creating a condition of continuing instability: the dollar is not a strong currency to the intrinsic qualities and magical, but only because it is guaranteed by the federal state and the U.S. military.
3) This situation may go out or taking a decisive step forward on the road to political unity, or a reversion to the monetary sovereignty of individual states or areas.
4) The first step in the direction of the unit policy of the European peoples is a constitution that does not exist today. The Treaty of Lisbon is something less of an ugly building regulations.
5) The EU constitution could only come from a constituent assembly elected by direct universal suffrage and proportional with a law that meets the criterion in a strict representation of the number of inhabitants and then ratified by referendum by the people.
6) The next steps and how to get to the election of a parliament and a European government with real power and convenience are matters to be delegated to the Constituent Assembly.
7) The sovereignty restored so justifies the adoption of a single currency, a central bank under the control of the government of the union that descends international alliances, acquiring an adequate defense policy that assumes the existence of a European army with its own independent command structures outside of existing alliances signed by the individual states , if that should ever be discussed by the union government.
The framework points outlined moves within a concept of representative democracy and sovereignty on the model of bourgeois constitutions which certainly is not the ultimate horizon of political democracy, but, failing which, all talk of sovereignty is only an empty word.
0 comments:
Post a Comment